SHARINE ANDERSON
v.
ICENTER LLC D/B/A CREDEX

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-09-09
No. 2025-2611
Shepherd, J., Lott, J., Coates, Jr., Howard K., Associate Judge, Gilman, Judge
2026 FL 11823 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An order compelling arbitration is affirmed where the appellant challenges it on appeal.


Headnotes

[1] An appellant must attach a conformed copy of the order being appealed to the notice of appeal; failure to do so results in dismissal of that portion of the appeal for lac…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Because there is no transcript or order for us to review regarding costs, we dismiss that portion of the appeal.”

Court's explanation for dismissing the arbitration costs portion of the appeal

Facts & Procedural History

Sharine Anderson appealed from a trial court order compelling arbitration in a dispute with ICenter LLC d/b/a Credex. Anderson also challenged an orde…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHARINE ANDERSON, Appellant,

V.

I CENTER, LLC, d/b/a CREDEX, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2611

[September 9, 2026]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Allison Gilman Judge; L.T. Case No. 062025CC059375AXXXSO.

Sharine D. Anderson, Hallandale Beach, pro se.

Paul E. Wilson, Plantation, for appellee.

SHEPHERD, J.

Appellant challenges the trial court's entry of an order compelling arbitration and an order regarding arbitration costs. We affirm the order compelling arbitration and dismiss the remainder of the appeal.

The order on arbitration costs is not mentioned in the notice of appeal, attached to the notice of appeal, or included in the record on appeal. Because there is no transcript or order for us to review regarding costs, we dismiss that portion of the appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d) (requiring that the appellant in a noncriminal case attach a conformed copy of the order being appealed to the notice of appeal).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

LOTT, J., and COATES, JR., HOWARD K., Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw