MATTHEW RAY MISNER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A circuit court summarily denying a rule 3.801 motion for jail credit must attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim.
[1] A circuit court summarily denying a motion for correction of jail credit under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 must attach portions of the record that conclusive…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A circuit court summarily denying a rule 3.801 motion must attach portions of the record that conclusively refute it.”
Citation to MacNeill v. State, 301 So. 3d 471, 472 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020), establishing the procedural requirement.
Matthew Misner appealed the summary denial of his motion for clarification (treated as a motion to correct an illegal sentence under rule 3.800(a)) an…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2026-0697 LT Case Nos. 59-2021-CF-935-B 59-2021-CF-945-A 59-2021-CF-946-A 59-2021-CF-1216-A
MATTHEW RAY MISNER,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. Melissa D. Souto, Judge.
Matthew Ray Misner, Jasper, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
September 18, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Matthew Misner (“Misner”) appeals the summary denial of his motion for clarification, treated by the postconviction court as a motion to correct an illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), and his motion for correction of jail credit under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. The court found that Misner was not entitled to the jail credit sought in either motion. However, in denying Misner's rule 3.801 motion,
the court failed to attach records conclusively refuting that claim. See MacNeill v. State, 301 So. 3d 471, 472 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (“A circuit court summarily denying a rule 3.801 motion must attach portions of the record that conclusively refute it."); Hurlburt v. State, 376 So. 3d 89, 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) (reversing and remanding summary denial of a rule 3.801 motion because the court did not attach the necessary records to the order). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
JAY, C.J., and WALLIS and KILBANE, JJ., concur.