KALVIN PRINGLE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Rule 3.800(a) is not the proper procedural vehicle for raising a claim of sentencing error under Apprendi v. New Jersey and its progeny.
[1] Rule 3.800(a) is not the proper procedural vehicle for raising a claim of sentencing error under Apprendi v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Rule 3.800(a) is not the proper vehicle for raising a claim of error under Apprendi [v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),] and its progeny.”
The court's rationale for affirming, citing Maye v. State
Kalvin Pringle appealed from a conviction in Highlands County Circuit Court, raising a claim of sentencing error under Apprendi.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-1001 Lower Tribunal No. 2007-CF-000306
KALVIN PRINGLE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County. David V. Ward, Judge.
September 18, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Maye v. State, 51 Fla. L. Weekly S116, S116 (Fla. May 14, 2026) ("[R]ule 3.800(a) is not the proper vehicle for raising a claim of error under Apprendi [v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),] and its progeny. . . ."), reh'g denied, No. SC2023-1184, 2026 WL 2243835 (Fla. Aug. 4, 2026).
TRAVER, C.J., and NARDELLA and MIZE, JJ., concur.
Kalvin Pringle, Mayo, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilynn Frances Muir, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.