ENTERPRISE MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTING, INC. WILLIAM W. HISCOCK, AND JOSEPH RZESZOTKO
v.
TIMOTHY A. TADLOCK, AN INDIVIDUAL AND SHAREHOLDER OF ENTERPRISE MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTING, INC.,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed on appeal.
This case involves a dispute between Enterprise Maintenance and Contracting, Inc., William W. Hiscock, and Joseph Rzeszotko against Timothy A. Tadlock…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case Nos. 5D2025-3233 5D2025-3234 LT Case No. 2012-CA-000866 ENTERPRISE MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTING, INC., WILLIAM W. HISCOCK, and JOSEPH RZESZOTKO,
Appellants,
v. TIMOTHY A. TADLOCK, an Individual and Shareholder of Enterprise Maintenance and Contracting, Inc., Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. G.L. Feltel, Jr., Judge. Robert B. George, of The Liles Firm, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant, Enterprise Maintenance and Contracting, Inc., Albert T. Franson, of Shuffield Lowman, Orlando, for Appellants, William W. Hiscock and Joseph Rzeszotko. Jessie L. Harrell, of The Harrell Firm, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
November 5, 2026
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. MAKAR, WALLIS, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
2