S. H.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, STATEWIDE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order regarding the dependency of the three children and the actions of the Department of Children and Families and Guardian ad Litem Office were proper and legally sufficient.
This case involves three children, S.S., A.H., and G.M., who were the subject of a dependency proceeding in Pinellas County Circuit Court.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dependency Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of S.S., A.H., and G.M., children.
S.H.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM OFFICE,
Appellees.
No. 2D2026-0759
November 6, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Kimberly Campbell, Judge.
Keith Peterson of Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant.
Bruce Bartlett, State Attorney, and Leslie M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Tallahassee, for Appellee Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.