NORTH SHORE BANK

v.

LOVI

Citator

Cited By

• Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 1987)
  …1976); Hotel Roosevelt Co. v. Hill, 196 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); But see Radio Communications Corp. v. Oki Electronics of America, Inc., 277 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Lovi v. North Shore Bank, 137 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 143 So. 2d 492 (1962). Orders granting discovery, on the other hand, have traditionally been reviewed by certiorari. See e.g., Procter & Gamble Co. v. Swilley, 462 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Jackson, 445 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 198…
• Maas Bros., Inc. v. Bishop, 204 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
  …e jury alone. The trial court was not permitted to consider it for purposes of ruling on appellant’s motions for directed verdict or its motion to set aside the verdict. Massaline v. Rich, Fla.App., 137 So. 2d 10, 12-13, cert. denied mem., Fla.1962, 143 So. 2d 492. Thus, Mrs. Clarenden’s testimony that Mrs. Bishop slipped on the metal strip had probative value toward appellees’ proof of a prima facie case. Secondly, Mrs. Clarenden and Mr. Bishop both testified that after the accident they had run their feet…
• Jockey Club, Inc. v. Bleemer, 413 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …o the amounts recoverable, interest should be awarded from the date payment was due. Peter Marich & Associates, Inc. v. Powell, 365 So. 2d 754 (Fla.2d DCA 1978) (architects’ services); Huntley v. Baya, 136 So. 2d 248 (Fla.3d DCA 1962), cert. denied, 143 So. 2d 492 (Fla.1962) (attorney’s fees; quantum meruit claim); see generally, Parker v. Brinson Construction Co., 78 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1955). Moreover, since the amount of interest is itself a liquidated, mathematically calculable sum, a retrial is not required…