MOREY
v.
STATE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2019-03-27
No. 3D18-1968
Downey, Gunther, Stone
272 So. 3d 464 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2019) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A defendant is procedurally barred from seeking postconviction relief on a substantive claim that was or should have been raised on direct appeal, and cannot avoid this bar by recasting the claim as ineffective assistance of counsel.


Headnotes

[1] A defendant is procedurally barred from seeking postconviction relief on a substantive claim that was or should have been raised on direct appeal, and may not avoid this…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Morey sought postconviction relief, apparently raising a substantive claim that should have been presented on direct appeal.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 769 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 2000) (holding movant is procedurally barred from seeking postconviction relief on a substantive claim that was or should have been raised on direct appeal; movant may not avoid this procedural bar by merely recasting substantive claim as one for ineffective assistance of counsel). See also Reed v. State, 116 So. 3d 260, 264 (Fla. 2013) (holding: "To obtain a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a defendant must meet two requirements: (1) the evidence must not have been known by the trial court, the party, or counsel at the time of trial, and it must appear that the defendant or defense counsel could not have known of it by the use of diligence; and (2) the newly discovered evidence must be of such nature that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial") (citing Jones v. State (Jones II ), 709 So. 2d 512, 521 (Fla.1998) ).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw