JARTAVIS JAMEL PEACOCK
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2019-04-10
No. 16-5478
Nora Beth Dorsey
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court commits error by entering a second judgment in conjunction with amended written sentences.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court commits error when it enters a second judgment in conjunction with the entry of new or amended written sentences.

[2] Written sentences must reflect the trial court's oral pronouncement regarding costs imposed under sections 938.10 and 938.085, Florida Statutes.

Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“it was error to enter a second judgment in conjunction with the entry of new written sentences”

Court citing Freeman v. State, 225 So. 3d 929, 930 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)

Facts & Procedural History

Peacock was convicted and sentenced in Hillsborough County. A second written judgment was entered simultaneously with amended written sentences.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Jartavis Jamel Peacock's convictions and sentences. However, we reverse the second written judgment which was entered simultaneously with the entry of the amended written sentences, and we direct the trial court to strike the second judgment on remand. See Freeman v. State, 225 So. 3d 929, 930 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (holding that it was error to enter a second judgment in conjunction with the entry of new written sentences). With regard to the written sentences, the trial court shall strike the costs imposed pursuant to sections 938.10 and 938.085, Florida Statutes (2015), so that the written sentences reflect the trial court's oral pronouncement on said costs.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw