HAHN
v.
HAHN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decisions regarding Erica and Brooke Hahn and dismissed the appeal concerning Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A. due to a pending counterclaim.
The court affirmed the lower court's decisions regarding Erica and Brooke Hahn. The appeal concerning Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A. was dismissed.
[1] An appellate court must dismiss an appeal as premature when a counterclaim remains pending in the lower court.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“On all issues involving the Hahns, we affirm without discussion.”
Establishes the court's decision on the first set of issues.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWilliam David Hahn appealed multiple rulings from the lower court. His appeal included issues related to Erica and Brooke Hahn, and separate issues co…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Elements Of Conspiracy cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
WILLIAM DAVID HAHN,
Appellant,
v.
ERICA HAHN, BROOKE HAHN, ALAN WEINSTEIN, as Trustee, WAYNE KAPLAN, and WAYNE KAPLAN, P.A.,
Appellees.
No. 4D17-3919
[April 10, 2019]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carol-Lisa Phillips, Dale Ross, and David A. Haimes, Judges; L.T. Case No. CACE 2009-039029 (11).
Meah Rothman Tell of Meah Rothman Tell, P.A., Lauderhill, for appellant.
John P. Seiler and Steven A. Wahlbrink of the Law Offices of Seiler, Sautter, Zaden, Rimes & Wahlbrink, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Erica Hahn and Brooke Hahn.
Wayne Kaplan of Wayne Kaplan, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A.
WEISS, DALIAH H., Associate Judge.
Appellant raises multiple points on appeal. Points one, two, and five, as numbered in appellant’s brief, pertain to Erica and Brooke Hahn. Points three, four, six, and seven address Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A. On all issues involving the Hahns, we affirm without discussion. On the remaining issues concerning Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A., we dismiss the appeal due to the pendency of a counterclaim in the lower court. See Mendez v. W. Flagler Family Ass’n, 303 So. 2d 1, 5 (Fla. 1974).
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part. WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
2
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.