RICHARD JONES
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Richard Jones appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Polk County. The specific facts underlying the appeal are not detailed in this per curiam…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William D. Sites, Judge. Richard Jones, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b); Ransone v. State, 48 So. 3d 692 (Fla. 2010); Steadman v. State, 23 So. 3d 811 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Robinson v. State, 818 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brito v. State, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Murray v. State, 36 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). KELLY, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI,JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Stovall v. Sergeant William Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Ransone v. State, 48 So. 3d 692 (Fla. 2010)
- Steadman v. State, 23 So. 3d 811 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
- Galarza v. State, 818 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Brito v. State, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)