CHRISTOPHER VIDAL
v.
ATHLETES USA, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Fourth District affirmed a preliminary injunction against appellants in a commercial dispute involving the Athletes USA brand, remanding only for clarification of the injunction's scope regarding competitive restrictions.
A preliminary injunction restricting competitive use of the Athletes USA brand, mark, or logo was properly granted, with clarification needed on the scope of restrictions.
[1] A preliminary injunction restricting competitive use of a commercial brand must clearly specify whether restrictions apply only to use of the brand itself or to broader c…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChristopher Vidal, Athletes USA Group, LLC, and Athletes USA Limited [UK] were enjoined from certain competitive acts in a commercial dispute involvin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Injunction Scope cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Vidal, Athletes USA Group, LLC and Athletes USA Limited [UK] appeal a circuit court order that granted a motion for preliminary injunction against them in a commercial dispute. We have reviewed the detailed order and affirm without discussion on all issues raised. However, we remand for the circuit court to clarify its order on one point only. The court shall omit the word “or” as it appears in its disposition section A (4), pages 55 and 56, to reflect its intention to restrict acts of competition only through use of the Athletes USA brand, mark or logo. Affirmed and Remanded.
WARNER, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 (U.S. 1960)
- United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 (U.S. 1980)
- Combs v. United States, 408 U.S. 224 (U.S. 1972)
- Dean v. State, 478 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1985)
- Coster v. State, 392 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Daley v. State, 398 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)