HARVEY J. KRUSE, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN LOUIS SANTANGELO, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1962-08-10
No. 2818
SHANNON, C. J., and KANNER and SMITH, JJ., concur.
143 So. 2d 727 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1962) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Russo v. Clark, Fla.1962, — So.2d -; Hendrick v. Strazzula, Fla.1961, 135 So.2d 1; Hygema House Movers v. McDonald, Fla.App.1961, 125 So.2d 902; and Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669.

SHANNON, C. J., and KANNER and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Carman v. Gunn, 198 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
    …of the corporation consisted of realty; and also the derivative fact that the contract made no attempt to legally describe the real property. We hold this is a “distinction without a difference” under Harbeson v. Jackson Land Company, Fla.App.1962, 143 So. 2d 727. In that case the Harbesons had contracted with Jackson Land Company, a corporation, to sell a certain Pensacola Hotel property, the form of the transaction being the agreement of Jackson Land to purchase from the Harbesons controlling shares of the…
  • Hurley v. Thomas, 169 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
    …at could not be purchased on the open market, McCutcheon v. National Acceptance Corporation, 1940, 143 Fla. 663, 197 So. 475, 130 A.L.R. 915; or stock, the value of which could .not be readily ascertained, Harbeson v. Jackson Land Co., Fla.App.1962, 143 So. 2d 727, and are clearly distinguishable from the instant case, In the case presently before the court, the stock was actively quoted on the “over-the-counter” market, and the record shows actual transactions in the stock as between the parties to this lit…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw