LAURA'S SECRET, L L C
v.
ROBERT L. GRIER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order denying the emergency motion to compel compliance and for contempt is a non-final, non-appealable order subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, while the trial court's order imposing a temporary injunction freezing assets is affirmed without prejudice to future review.
[1] An order denying an emergency motion to compel compliance with a court order and for contempt is a non-final, non-appealable order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedu…
[2] A temporary injunction freezing assets and requiring deposit of funds may be affirmed without prejudice to a party seeking review of appealable orders entered following d…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellants Laura Timmons and Laura's Secret, LLC appealed a trial court order denying Shauna Grier's verified emergency motion to compel compliance wi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Dissolve cases and more on FLexlaw
BADALAMENTI, Judge.
We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction appellants' challenge to the trial court's July 13, 2018, order denying as an emergency Shauna Grier's verified emergency motion to compel compliance with court order and for contempt. The order is a nonfinal, nonappealable order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130. Based on the limited record before us and the fact that a motion to dissolve is pending, we affirm the trial court's separate order that is in the nature of a temporary injunction—freezing assets and requiring deposit of funds—without prejudice to either party to seek review of any appealable order entered following resolution of the motion to dissolve. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.