PENNY BARNES
v.
WENDY JOHNS, AND THE WARRINGTON BANK, A CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A party is bound by prior admissions made under oath.
[1] A party is bound by admissions made under oath and may not subsequently contradict or escape the consequences of such admissions.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePenny Barnes appealed a circuit court judgment in a case involving Wendy Johns and The Warrington Bank.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
AFFIRMED. See Holub v. Holub, 54 So. 3d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding that a party is bound by prior admissions under oath).
B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ James L. Chase and Virginia C. Ralls of Chase, Higdon & Ralls, PLC, Pensacola, for Appellant. Travis R. Johnson of Meador & Johnson, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellee Wendy Johns; Linda A. Hoffman of Carver, Darden, Koretzky, Tessier, Finn Blossman & Areaux, LLC, Pensacola, for Appellee The Warrington Bank.