RAYMOND F. PRIGGER, CHIROPRACTIC PHYSICIAN, APPELLANT,

v.

MARGARET KINGERY AND FORD KINGERY, HER HUSBAND, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• RAY v. Mercy Hosp., 169 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
  …ot entitled to be entertained and determined by this court under rule 4.6, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A. See Schwob Co. v. Florida Industrial Commission, 152 Fla. 203, 11 So. 2d 782; Hunter v. Flowers, Fla. 1949, 38 So. 2d 438; Prigger v. Kingery, Fla.App.1962, 144 So. 2d 323. It is so ordered.…
• State v. Potter, 224 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1969)
  …rued in order to avoid encroachment on the full and proper exercise of jurisdiction by the trial judges.3 We are therefore, compelled to deny the certificate. ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur. . Prigger v. Kingery, 144 So. 2d 323 (Fla. App.3rd 1962). . Waite v. Wilson, 54 So. 2d 152, 153 (Fla. 1951); Hunter v. Flowers, 38 So. 2d 438 (Fla.1949). . Newcomb v. Roarty, 93 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1957); Stark v. Malcom, 38 So. 2d 469 (Fla.1949).…
• Johnson v. Se. Title & Ins. Co., 148 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)
  …S.A. It appearing that the trial court has already made a judicial determination of the primary questions involved, there is no basis for the entertaining of certified questions, and the certificate is denied. See: Prigger v. Kingery, Fla.App.1962, 144 So. 2d 323.…

Authorities Cited

• Hunter v. Flowers, 38 So.2d 438 (Fla. 1949)