AKHNATEN CASEY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's decision was affirmed.
Akhnaten Casey, proceeding pro se, appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, Judge. Akhnaten Casey, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Mendenhall v. State, 48 So. 3d 740 (Fla. 2010); Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Flowers v. State, 69 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Coke v. State, 955 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Lykins v. State, 894 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Thomas v. State, 778 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and SALARIO,JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
- Mendenhall v. State, 48 So. 3d 740 (Fla. 2010)
- Thomas v. State, 778 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Hatachi Coke v. State, 955 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
- Flowers v. State, 69 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)