ROOSEVELT JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROOSEVELT JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
146 So. 2d 108
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
This appeal brings for review the judgment and sentence entered as a result of the defendant’s conviction of the offense of third degree murder. The point raised by the defendant in this appeal is whether the statement made by the prosecuting attorney regarding the law of the case constituted reversible error. , ,
We have heard argument of counsel for the respective parties and carefully considered their briefs together with the record before us. No reversible error was found.
The judgment and sentence is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't OF Admin. v. Mallory E. Horne, 269 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1972)…Opinion of Justices, 14 Fla. 285 (1872). . McSween v. State, Live Stock Sanitary Board, 97 Fla. 749, 122 So. 239, 125 So. 704 (1929); 65 A.L.R. 508; R. L. Bernardo & Sons, Inc. v. Duncan, 134 So. 2d 297 (Fla.App.1st 1961); Robinson’s Inc. v. Short, 146 So. 2d 108 (Fla.App.1st 1962) ; Crampton v. Zabriskie, 101 U.S. 601, 25 L.Ed. 1070 (1880); 16 C.J.S. Const.Law §§ 76 & 80; 81 C.J.S. States § 191. .See footnote 1 (Dichinson). . Rickman v. Whitehurst, 73 Fla. 152, 74 So. 205 (1917). . Fla.Const. art. Ill, §…
-
Baxter's Asphalt & Concrete, Inc. v. Liberty Cnty., 406 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…arguably was exposed to a lesser financial risk. Gulf’s failure to bid on alternate “A” also made the bids difficult to compare — a problem which the competitive bid statutes attempt to eliminate. Wester v. Belote, supra; Robinson’s, Inc. v. Short, 146 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962). [*465] Appellees’ endeavors to distinguish L. Pucillo & Sons, Inc., are unavailing. Appellees base their distinction upon the lower court’s finding that the two alternates required to be bid were mutually exclusive. Even if this…
-
Mayes Printing Co. v. Flowers, 154 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963)…[F.S.A.]. Therefore the result of splitting the invoice is to contravene the requirements, of law. Non-compliance with the stat [*864] ute renders the contract absolutely void. (Wester vs. Belote, supra; Robinson’s Inc. vs. Short * * * [Fla. [App.], 146 So. 2d 108]). “Having reached this conclusion we pass on to the remedial procedure attempted by the county commissioners. Obviously the Board was faced with an awkward situation since the equipment had been in use for several months. Apparently these counters…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence