BRENT MILLER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant is not entitled to a second review of an order that has already been appealed and affirmed.
[1] An appellant is not entitled to a second or successive appellate review of an order that has already been reviewed and decided on the merits in a prior appeal.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBrent Miller appealed an order that was previously the subject of appeal in case number 1D17-3773, which resulted in an affirmance without opinion on …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
June 12, 2019 PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order that was the subject of a prior appeal in case number 1D17-3773, which resulted in an affirmance without opinion. Miller v. State, 1D17-3773, 2019 WL 764218 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 21, 2019) (table). Since Appellant is not entitled to a second review of the same order, this duplicative appeal is dismissed.
DISMISSED.
RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Brent Miller, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.