CHRISTOPHER RANDALL COLE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Convictions for both possessing methamphetamine and possessing methamphetamine with intent to sell it within a thousand feet of a single proscribed location do not violate double jeopardy.
[1] Multiple convictions for possessing methamphetamine and possessing the same methamphetamine with intent to sell it do not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChristopher Randall Cole was convicted of possessing methamphetamine and possessing methamphetamine with intent to sell it within 1,000 feet of a sing…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
June 28, 2019 PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s convictions and sentences for both possessing methamphetamine, and possessing the same meth with intent to sell it, within a thousand feet of a single proscribed location, do not violate double jeopardy. Thomas v. State, 61 So. 3d 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); see also Johnson v. State, 150 So. 3d 214, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (collecting cases).
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Thomas v. State, 61 So. 3d 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
- Johnson v. State, 150 So. 3d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)