KEENAN R. STACKS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2019-07-23
No. 18-3062
Silberman, Casanueva, Morris
2017 WL 3495603 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2019)
Also reported at: 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11692 · 275 So. 3d 1257

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court did not err in denying post-conviction relief on all sixteen grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel alleged in the appellant's rule 3.850 motion.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted by jury of first degree murder and attempted first degree murder, and was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder and a cons…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-3062 _____________________________

KEENAN R. STACKS,

Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. John T. Brown, Judge.

July 23, 2019 PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial Appellant was convicted of first degree murder and attempted first degree murder. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murder and a consecutive 75 year sentence for the attempted murder. We affirmed his convictions and sentences on direct appeal in Stacks v. State, 177 So. 3d 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Appellant now challenges the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief on the sixteen grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel alleged in Appellant’s amended motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The State responded to five of the claims, as directed by the trial court. The trial court’s detailed order and attachments, including the

2

established law the court relied upon, conclusively demonstrated that Appellant is not entitled to relief on any of the grounds alleged. Therefore, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. WOLF, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Kennan R. Stacks, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw