GLORIA B. WILLIAMS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Gloria Williams appealed her 18-year sentence for kidnapping and interference with custody after stealing a newborn infant from a Jacksonville hospital in 1998 and raising the child in South Carolina for eighteen years. The appellate court conducted a full and independent review pursuant to Anders v. California and affirmed the sentence as lawful.
The court affirmed the 18-year sentence as lawful. The court rejected Williams's arguments that the sentence was unreasonable in light of mitigating factors and that it constituted cruel and unusual punishment.
[1] An appellate court must conduct a full and independent review of the record when counsel files a brief pursuant to Anders v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn 1998, Gloria Williams stole a newborn infant from a Jacksonville hospital and fled to South Carolina, where she raised the child for approximately …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Direct Appeal Review cases and more on FLexlaw
July 29, 2019 PER CURIAM.
In 1998, Gloria Williams stole a newborn infant from a Jacksonville hospital and fled to South Carolina, where she raised the child for some eighteen years. After her eventual apprehension, Williams entered a negotiated plea to kidnapping and interference with custody. Under the terms of the agreement, she would be sentenced to between zero and twenty-two years for the kidnapping, and between zero and five years (concurrent) as to the interference with custody. The State agreed that it would request that the federal government not pursue any additional charges. After a sentencing hearing, the court imposed a sentence of eighteen years. This is Williams’s direct appeal.
Williams’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), concluding that there is no arguable issue for appeal. In this circumstance, we must complete a full and independent review of the record, see In re Anders Briefs, 581 So. 2d 149, 151 (Fla. 1991), and having done so, we too conclude there is no arguable issue for reversal. We reject as meritless the arguments Williams made in her pro se brief—that the eighteen-year sentence was unreasonable in light of mitigating factors and that it constituted cruel and unusual punishment. The sentence was lawful.
AFFIRMED.
ROWE, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee; Gloria B. Williams, pro se, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- In re App. Court Response to Anders Briefs, 581 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1991)