H.S., NATURAL FATHER OF E.R.S-R., MINOR CHILD
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's decision affirming DCF's action was proper.
[1] Termination of parental rights requires clear and convincing evidence that the parent is unfit or that return of the child to the parent's care would be harmful; failure…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis case concerns a minor child, E.R.S-R., and involves H.S., the natural father of the child, appealing a decision by the Department of Children and…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
RAY, C.J., and WOLF and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Ryan Thomas Truskoski of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Sarah J. Rumph of Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Thomasina F. Moore and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb of Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, and Anthony C. Musto of Guardian ad Litem Program, Hallandale Beach, for Guardian ad Litem Program.