MURPHY ARNOLD BROCKINGTON JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must enter a written order that conforms to its oral pronouncement regarding probation revocation findings.
[1] A trial court's written order in a probation revocation proceeding must be consistent with and conform to the court's oral findings and pronouncements made during the evi…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant's probation was revoked by written order. At the evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Appellant had not violated condition (10) o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Order cases and more on FLexlaw
August 5, 2019 PER CURIAM In this Anders* appeal, Appellant challenges the trial court’s order revoking his probation. At an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Appellant had not violated condition (10) of his probation. However, the written order entered by the trial court revoking Appellant’s probation stated that Appellant had violated condition (10) of his probation. We remand for the trial court to enter a written order that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Leggs v. State, 27 So. 3d 155, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Baldwin v. State, 855 So. 2d 1180, 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Burgin v. State, 623 So. 2d 575, 576-77 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
B.L. THOMAS, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Burgin v. State, 623 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Cleveland Baldwin v. State, 855 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
- Lakeisha Shayolanda Leggs v. State, 27 So. 3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)