LAMETRIA FREEMAN
v.
ANGIE GUILLORY CROCHET
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's decision is affirmed where the appellant, bearing the burden of demonstrating error, failed to provide a transcript necessary to show reversible error.
[1] An appellant bears the burden of demonstrating reversible error on appeal, and the absence of a transcript precludes such demonstration.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“trial court decisions are presumed correct, appellant bears burden of demonstrating error, and absence of a transcript makes it impossible to show reversible error”
Court's rationale for affirming the trial court decision, citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
Lametria Freeman appealed a trial court decision against her in a matter involving Angie Guillory Crochet. Freeman proceeded pro se.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellant'S Burden To Demonstrate Error cases and more on FLexlaw
August 13, 2019 PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (noting that trial court decisions are presumed correct, appellant bears burden of demonstrating error, and absence of a transcript makes it impossible to show reversible error).
ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Lametria Freeman, pro se, Appellant. Angie Guillory Crochet, pro se, Appellee.