BOBBY BULLOCK
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court affirmed the probation revocation but remanded for entry of a corrected order specifying the particular condition of probation that the appellant admitted to violating.
An order revoking probation must specify the condition of probation that the defendant admitted to violating.
[1] An order revoking probation must specify the particular condition of probation that the defendant admitted to violating.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBobby Bullock's probation was revoked and his motion to correct sentencing error was denied. Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief indicating she …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dna Evidence Admissibility cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Appellant’s counsel filed a brief informing the court that she cannot make an argument for reversal of the judgment and sentence or order revoking Appellant’s probation. However, after Appellant’s motion to correct sentencing error was denied, counsel argues that the order revoking probation must be corrected to specify the condition of probation Appellant admitted to violating. We agree and remand for entry of a corrected order revoking probation. See Lee v. State, 826 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Appellant need not be present.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED. WOLF, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Candice K. Brower, General Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Gainesville, and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- LEE v. State, 826 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)