CHADRICK A. HALL
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Sentencing issues cannot be reviewed on appeal where the appellant failed to preserve the issue through a timely 3.800(b) motion.
[1] A habitual felony offender designation and discrepancies between oral sentence pronouncement and written judgment cannot be reviewed on appeal absent preservation through…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChadrick A. Hall appealed his conviction and sentence from the Circuit Court for Alachua County, raising challenges to his habitual felony offender de…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Felony Offender cases and more on FLexlaw
September 23, 2019 PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Brannon v. State, 850 So. 2d 452, 456 (Fla. 2003) (finding that habitual felony offender designation could not be reviewed in the absence of filing a 3.800(b) motion preserving the issue); Daniels v. State, 118 So. 3d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that a discrepancy between the oral sentence pronouncement and the written judgment and sentence could not be corrected where the appellant did not preserve the sentencing error).
B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Brannon v. State, 850 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2003)
- Elbert N. Daniels v. State, 118 So. 3d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)