RICHARD L. CHAMBLISS
v.
SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, BROWARD COUNTY AND STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A habeas corpus petition that raises procedurally barred postconviction claims that are untimely and successive is properly denied.
[1] A habeas corpus petition that seeks to raise postconviction claims is unauthorized when those claims are untimely, successive, and procedurally barred under the applicabl…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRichard L. Chambliss filed a habeas corpus petition in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit of Broward County relating to a criminal case from 1994.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Untimely Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is summarily affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). The petition was unauthorized, see Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1238 (Fla. 2004), and attempted to raise a procedurally barred postconviction claim. Thompson v. State, 88 So. 3d 312, 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). The trial court correctly determined that, if treated as a rule 3.850 motion, the petition would be untimely and successive.
LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur. * * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)
- Thompson v. State, 88 So. 3d 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)