W.M, THE FATHER
v.
DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's judgment in the dependency case is affirmed.
W.M., a father, appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, involving a dependency matter under c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Per Curiam Opinion cases and more on FLexlaw
Jonathan W. Taylor of Moffa, Sutton & Donnini, P.A., Pro Bono, Guardian Ad Litem Program, Defending Best Interest Project, Fort Lauderdale; and Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See J.D. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 263 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019); D.E. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 979 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); C.J. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 968 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); T.R. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 864 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); D.D. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 773 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
C.J. v. Dep't of Child. & Families (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)…part, as permitting a child to live in an environment that “causes the child’s physical, mental, or emotional health to be significantly impaired or to be in danger of being significantly impaired”); see also J.D. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 263 So. 3d 60, 62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (“It is 3 not necessary to establish that the child saw or was aware of the domestic violence for a finding of neglect.”); C.J. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 968 So. 2d 121, 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“It is not alwa…
-
R.B. v. Dep't of Child. & Families (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…the mother to develop a case plan, with the goal of reunification of the mother with her child[ ]. Thus, this dependency action—unlike a TPR action—shouldn’t be viewed as an ending, but rather, as a beginning. J.D. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 263 So. 3d 60, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Thus, we affirm the sound order under review. Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- D.D. as Parent of E.R. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 773 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
- T.R. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 864 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
- C.J. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 968 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
- D.E. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 979 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
- J.D. v. Dept. of Child. & Families, 263 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)