HOWARD M. SONN, SOUTHERN VENDING CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND A-1 CIGARETTE SERVICE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM N. ISAACS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1962-12-18
No. 62-552
Before HORTON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
147 So. 2d 572 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants seek review, by interlocutory appeal, of an order for production of documents.

It appears from the record [and counsel conceded in oral argument] that the alleged order has never been filed for record. Therefore, there is a fundamental jurisdictional defect in this appeal and it will be dismissed sua sponte.

Appeal dismissed without prejudice.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wash. Sec. Co. v. Tracy's Plumbing & Pumps, Inc., 166 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
    …. But in the comparable situation where no final judgment has been entered consequent to the appeal order, which merely grants a motion for summary judgment, the order is not final and is not appealable. See e. g. Williams v. Maddren, Fla.App.1962, 147 So. 2d 572; Stone v. Buckley, Fla.App.1960, 119 So. 2d 298; Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 33; Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 99 So. 2d 719; Brannon v. Johnson, Fla.1955, 83 So. 2d 779. . Rule 3.2(b) F.A.R.; Rule 1.3 F.A.R. “Rendit…
  • Palardy v. Vladimar Igrec, 388 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
    …l. McCready v. Villas Apartments, 379 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Bailey v. Allstate Insurance Co., 218 So. 2d 761 (Fla.2d DCA 1969); Pompano Paint Co. v. Pompano Beach Bank and Trust Co., 208 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); Williams v. Maddren, 147 So. 2d 572 (Fla.2d DCA 1962). We find further support for this conclusion in the language of the order itself. Its verbiage explicitly contemplates the eventual entry of a final judgment and, consequently, it cannot be said that the order of redemption evidenc…
  • Rice v. Doyle, 223 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
    …m such orders). [*785] The order herein granting the motion for partial summary judgment is clearly not a final order or judgment appealable as such under F.A.R. 3.2, Stone v. Buckley, Fla.App.1960, 119 So. 2d 298; Williams v. Maddren, Fla.App.1962, 147 So. 2d 572; and Pompano Paint Co. v. Pompano Beach Bank & Trust Co., Fla.App.1968, 208 So. 2d 152. In the instant appeal, the partial summary judgment was not final but was confined by its terms to the issue of liability alone. Therefore, judicial labor had n…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw