TIMOTHY STULTZ AND CAROLYN STULTZ
v.
BANKUNITED, N.A.

Fla. 4th DCA | 2020-05-21
No. 19-1115
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The trial court's judgment in the foreclosure action was affirmed.

Facts & Procedural History

Timothy and Carolyn Stultz were defendants in a mortgage foreclosure action brought by BankUnited, N.A. in Palm Beach County. The trial court entered …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Mortgage Foreclosure Cause Of Action Executive Order 20-94 Administrative Order Sc20-23 Florida Rule Of Civil Procedure 1.580(A)

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mortgage Foreclosure Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.1 LEVINE, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Footnotes
1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23 (the requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-94 (suspending and tolling any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law for 45 days from April 2, 2020). We trust any motions directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our mandate.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw