EVA CURIK
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, ETC.

Fla. 4th DCA | 2020-06-04
No. 19-2779
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The trial court's judgment in the foreclosure action was proper and is affirmed.

Facts & Procedural History

Eva Curik was the defendant in a mortgage foreclosure action brought by JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association in Broward County Circuit Court.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Mortgage Foreclosure Cause Of Action Administrative Order Sc20-23 Florida Rule Of Civil Procedure 1.580(A) Writ Of Possession

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mortgage Foreclosure Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.1

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Footnotes
1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23, Amendment 2 (the requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-137 (extending, until 12:01 a.m. on July 1, 2020, Executive Order 20-94, which suspends and tolls any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law). We trust any motions directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our mandate.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw