MICHAEL A. DUNLAP
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2020-09-10
No. 18-5177
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A discretionary fine under section 775.083, Florida Statutes, may not be imposed without the trial court orally pronouncing the fine and providing the defendant with notice and opportunity to be heard.


Headnotes

[1] A discretionary fine imposed pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes, may not be imposed without notice and an opportunity to be heard.

[2] A trial court errs by imposing a discretionary fine and corresponding surcharge without orally pronouncing the fine.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Under section 775.083, the $1000 fine is discretionary and may not be imposed without notice and an opportunity to be heard.”

Court's explanation of the legal requirement violated by the trial court

Facts & Procedural History

Dunlap was convicted of five counts of burglary of a dwelling and five counts of grand theft. At sentencing, the trial court orally imposed $1,715 in …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

September 10, 2020 PER CURIAM.

Michael Dunlap appeals his judgment and sentence for five counts of burglary of a dwelling and five counts of grand theft. We affirm his judgment and sentence, except for the assessment of the $1,000 fine and $50 surcharge. We find that the trial court erred in imposing the fine and corresponding surcharge without orally pronouncing the fine.

At sentencing, the court orally imposed $1,715 in costs and fines but did not specify the various bases for its assessment. The written order, however, listed a fine pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes (2017), in the amount of $1,000, with a five percent surcharge of $50. Under section 775.083, the $1000 fine is discretionary and may not be imposed without notice and an

2

opportunity to be heard. Mills v. State, 177 So. 3d 984, 988 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (en banc). Appellant’s counsel filed a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) below challenging the imposition of the fine without notice, but this motion was denied. Because the court did not follow the proper procedure in imposing the $1,000 fine and $50 surcharge, and the issue is preserved, the fine and surcharge must be stricken. See id. If the court wishes to reimpose the fine and surcharge on remand, it may do so after providing the requisite notice and opportunity to be heard. Id.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw