MICHAEL DAVE RICHARDSON
v.
ALGEREE DIANE ADAMS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant must provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to show reversible error; insufficient documentation in the appendix does not support reversal.
[1] An appellant bears the burden of providing the appellate court with a record demonstrating reversible error, and failure to include sufficient documents in the appendix p…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMichael Dave Richardson appealed from a Circuit Court order in Duval County, both parties appearing pro se.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
September 15, 2020 PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (discussing appellant’s burden to provide the court with a record showing reversible error); Hill v. Hill, 765 So. 2d 99, 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (affirming appeal of non-final order where court ordered appellant to file a brief with appendix, and appellant filed an appendix with documents insufficient to support reversal). ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.