BRYANT ALLEN CODY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's judgment was affirmed based on applicable controlling precedent.
Bryant Allen Cody appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Polk County, with Judge Keith Spoto presiding. The appellant proceeded pro se.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stare Decisis cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Keith Spoto, Judge. Bryant Allen Cody, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2007); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); McNeil v. State, 993 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Nielson v. State, 984 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
- Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011)
- Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2007)
- Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
- Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
- Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)
- Gary v. State, 984 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
- D.E.R. v. State, 993 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)