BRANDON A. BAILEY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM AND NYKALA MICHELE VASQUEZ
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant who fails to participate in administrative proceedings by not returning required financial forms and fails to request an administrative hearing waives any challenge to the sufficiency of evidence supporting child support obligations.
[1] Failure to participate in administrative child support proceedings by returning required financial forms and failure to request an administrative hearing within the presc…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“By waiving his right to a hearing, Appellant waived his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Department's determination of his child support obligations.”
The court's explanation of how failure to participate in administrative proceedings results in waiver of appellate review rights.
Brandon Bailey was subject to a child support determination by the Department of Revenue. Bailey did not return the financial information forms provid…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Waiver Of Right To Hearing cases and more on FLexlaw
September 24, 2020 PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Standard v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Enf’t Program, 249 So. 3d 798, 798–99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (“Because Appellant failed to participate in the administrative proceedings by returning the forms for financial information supplied him by the Department and failed to request an administrative hearing after notice of his right to do so and the consequences for failing to do so, Appellant has not preserved any issue for this Court’s appellate review. By waiving his right to a hearing, Appellant waived his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Department’s determination of his child support obligations.”).
2
RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.