DYLAN RANDOLPH WOODWARD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A conviction and sentence are affirmed when the appellate record shows no error, but remand is required to correct a scrivener's error on the sentencing scoresheet.
[1] A scrivener's error on a Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet that misidentifies the method of resolving charges requires correction by remand to the trial court, even whe…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWoodward was found guilty by jury verdict of unspecified charges. His Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet contained a scrivener's error indicating the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we find no error with Dylan Woodward's judgment or sentence and affirm. We write only to correct a scrivener's error on Mr. Woodward's Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet.
Mr. Woodward was found guilty by jury verdict, but his scoresheet incorrectly indicates that the charges were resolved by plea. On remand, the trial court shall correct this error. Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener's error. MORRIS, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.