N.M., THE FATHER
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Parental rights termination based on constructive consent is upheld, but the trial court's judgment must be corrected to remove unsupported factual findings that misrepresented the evidentiary basis for termination.
[1] Termination of parental rights must reflect the actual evidentiary basis for the order and cannot include factual findings stated as proven by testimony when no competent…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“There being no competent, substantial testimony to support these facts, we remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect that termination was based on constructive consent, not testimony, and to strike any portions of the order indicating the contrary.”
Court's explanation for remand regarding scrivener's error in the judgment
N.M., the father, had his parental rights terminated in a dependency proceeding. The trial court's order stated that certain facts—including exposure …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constructive Consent cases and more on FLexlaw
Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.
PER CURIAM. N.M., the father, appeals an order terminating his parental rights. We find that the father’s arguments on appeal for reversal are meritless, and we affirm the termination of his parental rights based on his constructive consent.
However, we remand to the trial court for correction of what the Department of Children and Families concedes is a “scrivener’s error.” The order on appeal states that certain facts supporting the termination of parental rights, such as exposure of the child to substance misuse, sexual abuse, and domestic violence, as well as the father’s sexual abuse of another child, were “clearly and convincingly demonstrated through testimony.” (Emphasis added.) There being no competent, substantial testimony to support these facts, we remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect that termination was based on constructive consent, not testimony, and to strike any portions of the order indicating the contrary. Affirmed and remanded with instructions. DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN, JJ., and FRINK, KEATHAN, Associate Judge, concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.