CARLOS MANDRI
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Blakely v. Washington is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review, and a successful collateral attack on one sentence in a multi-count judgment does not affect the finality of the remaining sentences.
[1] Blakely v. …
[2] A successful collateral attack on the legality of one sentence in a multi-count judgment does not affect or toll the finality of the remaining sentences.
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCarlos Mandri appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in a matter involving sentencing and collateral review. The appeal conc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Blakely V. Washington cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Mandri v. State, 995 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). See also
Lee v. State, 895 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding that the decision in
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review); Delemos v. State, 969 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (recognizing that a successful collateral attack on the legality of one sentence in a multi-count judgment does not affect or toll the finality of the remaining sentences).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (U.S. 2004)
- Delemos v. State, 969 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
- Jontal LEE v. State, 895 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)