CRAIG BUNCH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's modification of community control and probation terms following a defendant's admission of violations is affirmed, but the disposition orders must be corrected to specify which conditions were violated.
[1] When a trial court modifies a defendant's community control and probation conditions following admission of violations, the disposition order must clearly specify which c…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCraig Bunch admitted to violations of the terms of his community control and probation. The trial court modified the terms of his community control an…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 17000711CFAXMX.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.
In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellant challenges the trial court’s judgment and order that modified the terms of his community control and probation after he admitted to violations. We affirm but remand for the trial court to correct the disposition orders to reflect the conditions that appellant violated. Stickney v. State, 263 So. 3d 67, 68 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Appellant need not be present.
Affirmed and remanded for entry of a corrected order. DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Stickney v. State, 263 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)