PLEADRO JERMAINE SCOTT
v.
STATE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2021-03-17
No. 21-0449
Luper Schuster
343 So. 3d 195 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court properly denied Scott's amended second or successive motion for post-conviction relief.


Headnotes

[1] In reviewing a post-conviction motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), appellate documents extraneous to the appealed order need not be considered e…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Scott sought a writ of habeas corpus to obtain leave to file a belated appeal of the trial court's September 1, 2020 order denying his post-conviction…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Opinion filed March 17, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-449 Lower Tribunal No. F08-8259

________________

Pleadro Jermaine Scott,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge. Pleadro Jermaine Scott, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.

On January 29, 2021, this Court, in case number 3D21-403, granted

appellant Pleadro Jermaine Scott’s petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

seeking leave to file a belated appeal of the trial court’s September1, 2020

order denying his post-conviction motion. After careful review of the

summary record,1 we affirm the trial court’s September1, 2020 Order

Denying Amended Second or Successive Motion for Post-Conviction Relief.

Affirmed.

Footnotes
1 Notwithstanding the requisites of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)(A), the summary record included several filings made after the entry of, and unrelated to, the appealed order. We disregarded those irrelevant inclusions.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw