BRIDGE GOLDE
v.
PIX REALTY, LP
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A tenant's failure to deposit rent into the court registry pursuant to court order constitutes an absolute waiver of the tenant's defenses and entitles the landlord to an immediate default for possession without further notice or hearing.
[1] A tenant's failure to deposit rent into the court registry pursuant to court order constitutes an absolute waiver of all defenses, and trial courts have no discretion in…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Failure of the tenant to pay the rent into the court registry pursuant to court order shall be deemed an absolute waiver of the tenant's defenses.”
Florida Statute § 83.232(5) (2019)
Bridgé Golde (tenant/appellant) failed to pay rent into the court registry as ordered by the trial court in a Miami-Dade County eviction action agains…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Waiver Of Defenses cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 83.232(5), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“Failure of the tenant to pay the rent into the court registry pursuant to court order shall be deemed an absolute waiver of the tenant’s defenses. In such case, the landlord is entitled to an immediate default for possession without further notice or hearing thereon.”); DTRS Intercontinental Mia., LLC v. A.K. Gift Shop, Inc.,
77 So. 3d 785, 786–87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (in holding that landlord was entitled to an immediate writ of possession where tenant failed to timely deposit the specified rent into the court registry, stating that “trial courts have no discretion in entering an immediate default for possession under these circumstances. The trial court may not consider the reasons why the deposit was not timely made” (quoting Park Adult Residential Facility, Inc. v. Dan
Designs, Inc., 36 So. 3d 811, 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010))).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Park Adult Residential Facility, Inc. v. DAN Designs, Inc., 36 So. 3d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
- DTRS Intercontinental Miami, LLC v. A.K. Gift Shop, Inc., 77 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)