INVESTORS SERVICE CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
T. P. WARLOW, JR., ET AL., APPELLEES
INVESTORS SERVICE CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
T. P. WARLOW, JR., ET AL., APPELLEES
149 So. 2d 910
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
We have studied the record in this appeal which arises from a summary final declaratory decree entered in favor of defendants Warlow, who were also counterclaimants and cross-claimants below.
The appellants complained that a summary final decree was entered when there were bona fide issues involved in the case. We find that the material issues involved were admitted in the various pleadings of the parties.
Finding no error in the record, the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
KANNER, A. C. J., and ALLEN and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Truxell v. Truxell, 259 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)…v. Turk (Fla.App.1960), 118 So. 2d 67. . Sherman, v. Herman (Fla.App.1970), 233 So. 2d 138; In re Estate of Simpkins (Fla.App.1967), 195 So. 2d 590. . Williams v. Williams (Fla.App.1965), 172 So. 2d 488; Fisher v. Maas Bros., Inc. (Fla.App.1963), 149 So. 2d 910; Vaughn v. Smith (Fla.1957), 96 So. 2d 143. . Anderson v. Smith (Fla.App.1968), 215 So. 2d 618. . Cowart v. City of West Palm Beach (Fla.1971), 255 So. 2d 673.…
-
In the Interest of F., 166 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…error has been made to appear from the record as to the report of the investigator, and no assignment of error was made as to this point. Therefore, the matter is not appropriately before the court. See: Fisher v. Maas Brothers, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 149 So. 2d 910; In Re Serrill’s Estate, Fla.App.1964, 159 So. 2d 246; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, §§ 66, 117, 290. As to the third and final contention, we have not been presented with any authority which requires a juvenile judge or a chancellor, in rendering a custody…