GLORIA S. GRAHAM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE WILLIAM J. GRAHAM TRUST DATED JUNE 16, 1986
v.
RANDY E. VIRGIL, SR., AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RANDY E. VIRGIL, JR.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court abuses its discretion by denying a motion to transfer venue based on forum non conveniens when the incident occurred in the proposed venue, all parties and witnesses are located there, and the statutory factors favor transfer.
[1] A trial court abuses its discretion by conditioning denial of a motion to transfer venue on forum non conveniens grounds upon completion of non-binding arbitration when t…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA negligent security case involved an incident that occurred in Palm Beach County on property located in Palm Beach County. All parties and nearly all…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Negligent Security cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court’s order denying Appellants’ motion to transfer venue from Broward County to Palm Beach County based on forum non conveniens. 1
Appellants presented overwhelming evidence in this negligent security case showing the incident at issue took place in Palm Beach County on property located in Palm Beach County. Moreover, all the parties and nearly all the witnesses are located in Palm Beach County, and all of the factors enumerated in section 47.122, Florida Statutes, weighed strongly in favor of transfer. ———————————————————————————————————— 1 The nonfinal order fixes the locus of the action in Broward County and “concern[s] venue,” thus making it appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(A). See Dep’t of Agric. v. Middleton, 24 So. 3d 624, 626–27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
The trial court recognized that the motion to transfer had merit, but denied the motion “without prejudice” because it wanted the parties to attend non-binding arbitration. This was an abuse of discretion. See Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. Est. of Chavez ex rel. Hernandez, 8 So. 3d 1157, 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that the trial court abused its discretion in not transferring the action from Miami-Dade County to Lee County in a case where the accident occurred in Lee County, the individuals involved in the accident resided in Lee County at the time of the accident, and the eyewitnesses and first responders resided in Lee County).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions for the trial court to grant the motion to transfer venue.
Reversed and remanded.
WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
SMA Behavioral Health Servs., Inc. v. Loewinger, 355 So. 3d 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
-
Armor Corr. Health Servs., Inc. v. Loewinger (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
Authorities Cited
- Dep't OF Agric. v. Bryant Middleton, 24 So. 3d 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)