V-ME MEDIA, INC.
v.
URPI RIOS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petitioner must demonstrate irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal as a condition precedent to invoking a district court's certiorari jurisdiction.
[1] Certiorari jurisdiction in district courts requires that the petitioner demonstrate irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal as a condition precedent to…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the Florida Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that [a] finding that the petitioning party has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal is a condition precedent to invoking a district court's certiorari jurisdiction.”
Standard for certiorari jurisdiction
V-Me Media, Inc. filed a petition for certiorari in the Third District Court of Appeal, apparently challenging a discovery order or similar lower cour…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Interlocutory Review cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. Piquet v. Clareway Props. Ltd., 314 So. 3d 423, 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (quoting Damsky v. Univ. of Miami, 152 So. 3d 789, 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)) (internal citations omitted) (“[T]he Florida Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that [a] finding that the petitioning party has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal is a condition precedent to invoking a district court’s certiorari jurisdiction.”); see also Bd.
of Trs. of Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Am. Educ. Enters., LLC, 99 So. 3d 450, 456 (Fla. 2012) (internal citations and quotations omitted) (“Certiorari jurisdiction does not lie to review every erroneous discovery order, and overbreadth alone is not a basis on which such jurisdiction will be granted.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Am. Educ. Enters., LLC, 99 So. 3d 450 (Fla. 2012)
- Damsky v. Univ. OF Miami & Alan Livingstone, M.D., 152 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
- Cristiano Piquet v. Clareway Props. Ltd., 314 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)