GLENN M. WRIGHT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Glenn Wright appealed the trial court's denial of his request for electronic records of his plea hearing, claiming the mere existence of a transcript was insufficient. The appellate court reversed, holding that Wright is entitled to electronic records of his hearing to the extent they exist, regardless of whether he already has a transcript.
A criminal defendant is entitled to obtain electronic records and recordings of his court proceedings to the extent that such records exist, notwithstanding his possession of an official transcript. The trial court's denial based solely on the availability of a transcript was error.
[1] A defendant's entitlement to electronic records of court proceedings under Florida's Rules of Judicial Administration is not defeated by the defendant's prior receipt of…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Records of the judicial branch include 'electronic records, videotapes, or stenographic tapes of court proceedings.'”
Florida's Rules of Judicial Administration definition of accessible records
In 2019, Wright requested stenographic notes or electronic recordings of his change of plea hearing from the Official Court Reporter. After repeated r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Public Access To Judicial Records cases and more on FLexlaw
September 22, 2021 PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, the State agrees with the argument made by Appellant Glenn Wright that his petition seeking electronic records of his plea hearing should have been granted below. We likewise conclude that if the electronic records sought by Wright exist, then he is entitled to obtain a copy of them upon paying the appropriate cost to produce them. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
In 2019, Wright made a request to the Official Court Reporter for any stenographic notes or electronic recordings of a change in plea hearing in his criminal case. A few months later, Wright sought relief from the trial court, alleging that “despite repeated requests” the court reporter had not provided him with the records.
The trial court denied Wright’s request citing the fact that he already possessed a copy of the official transcript.
Florida’s Rules of Judicial Administration establish a broad policy of allowing public access to judicial branch records. Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(a). Records of the judicial branch include “electronic records, videotapes, or stenographic tapes of court proceedings.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(b)(1)(A). In this case, Wright duly requested electronic records of his November 19, 2015 hearing so that he could check the accuracy of the transcript for alleged scrivener’s omissions. We reverse in Wright’s favor because he is entitled to such records to the extent that they exist. See Morency v. State, 223 So. 3d 439 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (finding the defendant entitled to any electronic recordings of his trial). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED
LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Glenn M. Wright, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.