CHRISTOPHER J. HRANEK
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
[1] A decision on an extraordinary writ petition decided on the merits constitutes a decision that bars the petitioner from presenting the same issue in subsequent proceeding…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChristopher Hranek filed a pro se petition in the Florida First District Court of Appeal seeking relief for alleged ineffective assistance of appellat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ineffective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
September 22, 2021 PER CURIAM.
The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that “clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits” is deemed a decision “which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel”).
RAY, JAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Christopher J. Hranek, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.