O.O., FATHER OF S.O., A MINOR CHILD
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's orders regarding the child's dependency status and custody were affirmed based on sufficient evidence in the record.
[1] A court may terminate parental rights when clear and convincing evidence establishes that continued parental custody poses a substantial risk of serious harm to the child…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved a dependency proceeding concerning a minor child, S.O., with the father, O.O., challenging the Department of Children and Families' …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Denise M. Bowen, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee. Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem.