IMPULSORA DE PRODUCTOS SUSTENTABLES S.A.P.I. DE C.V.
v.
SENEN DANIEL GARCIA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for certiorari to review a discovery stay order must be dismissed when the petitioner fails to demonstrate that the order will result in irreparable injury.
[1] To obtain certiorari review of an interlocutory order, a petitioner must demonstrate that the order will result in irreparable injury.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceImpulsora de Productos Sustentables sought certiorari review of a circuit court order staying certain discovery pending assertion of a viable cause of…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Irreparable Injury cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion filed November 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________ No. 3D21-1928 Lower Tribunal No. 21-10054 ________________ Impulsora de Productos Sustentables S.A.P.I. de C.V.,
Petitioner,
vs.
Senen Daniel Garcia, et al., Respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge. Law Office of Alan I. Karten, PLLC, and Alan I. Karten (Boynton Beach), for petitioner. Kaplan Zeena LLP, and James M. Kaplan, Robin Corwin Campbell, and Maria Kimijima, for respondents. Before EMAS, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, Impulsora de Productos Sustentables S.A.P.I. de C.V., seeks review, by means of a petition for certiorari, of a trial court order staying certain discovery until such time as a viable cause of action is asserted. Because petitioner has failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that the order will result in irreparable injury, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. See Villella v. Ansin, 263 So. 3d 823, 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019);
Valencia v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC, 317 So. 3d 178, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021); Damsky v. Univ. of Miami, 152 So. 3d 789, 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
Petition dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schwartz v. Rodriguez (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
-
Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. Trade Link Cap., Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- Damsky v. Univ. OF Miami & Alan Livingstone, M.D., 152 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
- Valencia v. Pennymac Holdings, LLC, 45 Fla. L. Weekly D2508 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
- Villella v. Ansin, 263 So. 3d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)