THOMAS LEVINS
v.
ROLAND PELTIER

Fla. 4th DCA | 2021-12-15
No. 21-0934
Doyle, Mirarchi, Pellegrini
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

When an exhibit attached to a complaint negates the pleader's cause of action through plain language, the document controls and may support a motion to dismiss.


Headnotes

[1] When an exhibit attached to a complaint contains unambiguous plain language that negates the pleader's cause of action, the document controls and may serve as the basis f…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“If an exhibit attached to a complaint negates the pleader's cause of action, the plain language of the document will control and may be the basis for a motion to dismiss”

Warren v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 662 So. 2d 1387, 1388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)

Facts & Procedural History

Thomas Levins appealed from a county court decision in Martin County involving a dispute where relevant documents were attached to the complaint.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Jennifer Waters, Judge; L.T. Case No. 43-2020-CC-000140.

Thomas Levins, Okeechobee, pro se. Elizabeth M. Rodriguez of Ford & Harrison, LLP, Miami, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Warren v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 662 So. 2d 1387, 1388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (stating that “[i]f an exhibit attached to a complaint negates the pleader’s cause of action, the plain language of the document will control and may be the basis for a motion to dismiss”); Churchville v. GACS Inc., 973 So. 2d 1212, 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (indicating that “[t]he validity and effect of a settlement and release are governed by contract law”); Custom Marine Sales, Inc. v. Boywic Farms, Ltd., 245 So. 3d 791, 792 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (observing that “[w]hen the language of a contract is unambiguous, it must be enforced based on its plain language”). GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw