BARON DE HIRSCH MEYER, MILTON WEISS AND LEO ROSE, JR., AS CO-PARTNERS D/B/A MEYER, WEISS, ROSEN & ROSE, APPELLANTS,

v.

PHYLLIS LASZLO, JOAN WORTON, NORMAN LIEBLING AND JANE BERNSTEIN ALPER, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Nury Agudo v. Marcelo Agudo, 411 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …of the paltry evidence supporting the change, far-fetched. Changing the custody of a child is not a device to be used to obtain compliance with other court orders. See Doran v. Doran, 212 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); State ex rel. Fox v. Webster, 151 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963); see also Dubocq v. Dubocq, 338 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). . This same concern was expressed by Mr. Agudo prior to the entry of the court’s order in October placing the child with Mrs. Agudo. By the time of the November hearin…
• Hoyt E. Morris and Viola Morris v. Myron M. Kridel, 179 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
  …e custody of the children in the light of the best interests or welfare of the children.” 153 So. 2d at 337. The Tom case, supra, expressly follows the Digirogio case, supra. It is also in accord with State ex rel. Fox v. Webster, Fla.App. 3, 1963, 151 So. 2d 14. [*133] The record in this case affirmatively shows that the trial judge considered himself bound by the prior New Jersey decree to the extent that he refused to determine the issue of who should have custody of the child. We hold that this reluctan…
• Spencer v. Mrs. Rochelle Terebelo Spencer, 305 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …94 So. 2d 44; Scarpetta v. DeMartino, Fla.App.1971, 254 So. 2d 813; Powell v. Powell, Fla.App.1971, 242 So. 2d 138; Fox v. Fox, Fla.App.1965, 179 So. 2d 103; Morris v. Kridel, Fla.App.1965, 179 So. 2d 130; State ex rel. Fox v. Webster, Fla.App.1963, 151 So. 2d 14. However, the court held that material changes in circumstances and the best interests and welfare of the children dictated a change in the Louisiana custody award. More specifically, the court found that the appellee’s romance with a married man,…